Throughout our nation’s history, the military has been made up mostly of men. Most people have probably considered the remote possibility of their husbands, fathers, brothers and sons being drafted to serve. But the fact of the matter is that women are also an integral part of the U.S. military, and these women will soon be taking a greater role in combat.

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta recently announced that the Obama administration is prepared to allow women in the armed forces the right to face direct enemy combat. In doing so, women will be able to occupy thousands of combat roles that they are currently excluded from. Many contend that this is a proper push for equality and progress within the military. Others view women engaging in direct combat to be a misguided and hazardous experiment.

Advocates for women in combat believe this inclusiveness will allow America’s armed forces to make use of truly talented women who have been in high risk scenarios before. But under the new policy, women could potentially be placed in front line combat positions such as the infantry and Special Forces battalions. The military proclaims these positions are more dangerous and therefore traditionally for men. In turn, women are placed in other positions.

Due to the changing landscape of warfare, the lines between the front line and the rear are rapidly blurring. Modern battle tactics have made every occupation in the armed forces a more dangerous position. Women in the military are becoming more accustomed to and equipped for life threatening situations. Essentially since many women already experience the heat of combat.

If equality in the military is to truly be achieved, all individuals who are willing to serve should have the right to do so, even if it is in the most dangerous capacity. Moreover, with gay and lesbian members of the armed forces finally able to openly serve their country, lifting the ban on women serving in combat seems like a logical step toward equality.

Furthermore, women, many of whom already serve in dangerous combat situations, will finally be recognized for their achievements. Men in combat have always been rewarded for their service, so it is only fair that women also receive medals for the same work.

That being said, numerous issues remain in the discussion of truly integrating females into combat.

Establishing gender-neutral physical qualifications for the infantry is already proving to be a difficult issue. Infantry forces are the main soldiers involved in foot operations. They not only travel long distances on foot, but also are expected to carry heavy loads.

The health effects for infantry soldiers can be exceptionally harsh, resulting in both long and short term damage. Research on the effects these perils will have on female soldiers is essential before judging the differences between men and women infantry members.

Ultimately, the move to allow women in the front lines of combat is a move toward equality, and equality is usually a good thing, even if the transition presents some challenges.